Introduction
A long-standing problem, mental health in the criminal justice system, has recently gained attention in the media and public conversation. The number of people with mental health disorders entering the criminal justice system has soared, with mass imprisonment rates at an all-time high. Unfortunately, many prisons and detention centers do not offer their inmates proper mental health care, which has a serious negative influence on their mental health and well-being. Inadequate care continues to be a problem despite the urgent need for mental health treatment in prisons. This disregard for these people’s needs violates their human rights and not only feeds the cycle of crime and recidivism. This essay will examine the complicated subject of mental health care for those who are jailed, examining the numerous causes of the issue and making the case for the necessity of offering quality treatment. It is crucial that we address the issue of inadequate mental health care in correctional facilities in order to stop the cycle of crime and guarantee the protection of inmates’ rights.
Background and Overview of the Issue
Correctional mental health care stretches back to the early nineteenth century when people suffering from mental illnesses were initially kept in jails and asylums. Individuals with mental illnesses were treated inhumanely at these facilities throughout time, prompting a series of reforms aimed at improving circumstances. Despite these attempts, mental health care in prisons has remained poor and has not kept up with advances in the area. Many people with mental illnesses are detained today and are not receiving the treatment they require. This neglect of their mental health can have catastrophic implications, including an increased risk of suicide, self-harm, and other types of violence. Inadequate mental health care also reinforces the cycle of crime and recidivism since untreated persons are more likely to re-offend and return to prison or jail. A lack of effective mental health care in prisons is not only destructive to the people involved, but it also has larger societal ramifications (Dillenburger and Kristin). It is critical that we enhance mental health treatment in prisons and guarantee that individuals detained receive the care they require to preserve their mental health and well-being. Failure to do so merely feeds the cycle of crime and recidivism, causing further social and economic consequences in our communities.
The Need for Mental Health Treatment in Correctional Facilities is Critical
Estimates indicate that a significant fraction of the prison population deals with mental illness, which highlights the shockingly high prevalence of mental health issues among those who are imprisoned. According to the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI), approximately one in five persons in the United States suffers a mental health issue at any one time, but the rate of mental illness among those who are jailed is significantly greater (Behrend). According to some estimates, up to 60% of inmates and detainees suffer from a mental disorder (Presley and Cuthrell 33). The crucial need for mental health care in correctional facilities is highlighted by the high frequency of mental health issues among those who are jailed. For both individuals and society as a whole, inadequate mental health care can have catastrophic repercussions. For instance, disregarding mental health requirements might result in symptoms getting worse, which increases distress, lowers the quality of life, and impairs performance.
Neglecting mental health care can also raise the likelihood of recidivism since people who have untreated mental health issues are more likely to commit crimes again and wind up in jail or prison. According to research, offering proper mental health care in correctional facilities may benefit both inmates and society as a whole (Beaudry et al. 764). For instance, research has shown that those who get mental health care are less likely to commit crimes again and are more likely to effectively reintegrate into society (Galletta et al. 60). Giving people access to mental health care can also assist them in managing their symptoms, enhancing their general functioning, and improving the quality of their lives. Overall, due to the high frequency of mental illness among those who are jailed, the need for mental health care in correctional facilities is crucial. While ignoring mental health requirements can have negative effects on people, getting the right therapy can benefit both individuals and society.
Inadequate Mental Health Treatment in Prisons is a Violation of Human Rights
Adequate mental health care for jailed people is not simply a concern of public health and safety; it is also a fundamental human right. International human rights treaties, such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights, acknowledge the right to health, including the right to mental health treatment, as an essential component of human dignity (May and Daly). However, mental health therapy is frequently ignored or poor in many jail facilities. This not only aggravates current mental health problems, but it can also contribute to the development of new mental health problems and prolong a recidivism cycle. This disregard for mental health treatment in prisons is a violation of human rights since it deprives people of their right to proper health care. It also violates their right to life and their right to be free of torture and other cruel, inhumane, or degrading treatment.
Furthermore, insufficient mental health care in incarceration fosters a cycle of marginalization and isolation for jailed people. It maintains a lack of access to sufficient mental health care and resources, making reintegration into society and leading productive lives more difficult for these individuals. To summarize, providing proper mental health care to detained prisoners is not just a moral necessity, but also a fundamental human right that must be respected. Failure to offer this care has a severe impact not just on the persons affected but also on the fundamental concepts of human rights and dignity.
Adequate Mental Health Treatment in Corrections Reduces Crime and Recidivism
To reduce crime and recidivism, correctional facilities must provide adequate mental health care. According to research, treating mental health problems while a person is jailed greatly lowers the risk that they would go back to a life of crime after they are released (Morin). This is due to the fact that treating mental health issues may aid sufferers in better managing their symptoms, which enhances general well-being and increases life stability. People who obtain the right mental health care are better able to reintegrate into society and preserve healthy bonds with friends, family, and coworkers. As people are less likely to engage in criminal conduct if they believe they have a support structure and a good view of life, this greater stability can assist in lowering the likelihood of recidivism.
Additionally, addressing mental health problems in prisons and other detention centers might aid in lowering the stress and trauma connected to the criminal justice system, which can encourage criminal conduct. For instance, untreated mental health issues like post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or anxiety can increase a person’s impulsivity, anger, and chance of engaging in criminal activity (Lewis). These people can learn to regulate their symptoms and become less likely to commit crimes if they receive mental health therapy. Overall, offering quality mental health care in prisons and jails is essential for lowering crime and recidivism. Additionally, to assist people in better managing their symptoms, it also lessens the stress and trauma connected to the criminal justice system, which enhances general well-being and lowers criminal activity.
The Broader Implications of Neglecting Mental Health Treatment in Correctional Facilities
A person’s family and community are also significantly impacted by their incarceration in addition to the prisoners themselves. Neglecting mental health needs in correctional facilities can have a domino effect on people related to the offender, feeding a cycle of trauma, poverty, and crime. People who are released from correctional facilities frequently have untreated mental health problems when they return to their communities, which can cause strained relationships with family and friends, difficulties obtaining and keeping a job, and a higher probability of reoffending (Scott et al.). Communities are negatively impacted by this because it feeds the cycle of poverty and crime and raises questions about public safety. Furthermore, providing sufficient mental health care in prisons might ultimately be more affordable. Early intervention for mental health problems increases the chance of effective reintegration into society and lowers the risk of reoffending, which may be an expensive procedure for the criminal justice system. As people with untreated mental health difficulties frequently turn to hospitals, emergency departments, and other public health services in times of crisis, addressing mental health needs can also lessen the pressure on these services.
Counterarguments: Cost and Prioritization Issues in Incarcerated Mental Health Treatment
The cost of providing comprehensive mental health care in correctional facilities is one of the main arguments against it. Critics claim that providing adequate mental health treatments in this setting is too expensive and that resources would be better spent elsewhere (Odgers and Jensen). This argument frequently focuses on the financial cost of implementing such programs as well as the criminal justice system’s limited resources. Some people argue that the major focus should be on punishment and rehabilitation, with mental health coming in second. They also claim that mental health services are widely available outside of correctional facilities, rendering such care unnecessary within the jails. To reject these assertions, it is necessary to consider the long-term repercussions of failing to provide mental health care while incarcerated. Individuals who do not receive sufficient treatment, for example, may be more likely to re-offend, resulting in higher incarceration costs and worse public safety.
Furthermore, it is critical to recognize that mental health is an important component of total health and well-being and that it is a fundamental right of all people, including those who are jailed. Adequate mental health care can also enhance overall rehabilitation and reintegration results, resulting in fewer people returning to the criminal justice system in the future. It is critical to recognize and address the counterarguments and weaknesses in the supporting arguments for providing mental health treatment in corrections, as this highlights the importance of balancing cost considerations with the benefits of improving incarcerated individuals’ mental health and well-being.
Opposing Viewpoint: The Cost of Mental Health Treatment in Correctional Facilities
Policymakers and budget managers are concerned about the cost of providing mental health care in correctional facilities. Opponents of increasing financing for mental health care in prisons claim that resources are limited and that other concerns, including physical security and basic needs such as food and shelter, must take precedence (Bonfine et al.). This approach, however, ignores the long-term advantages and cost savings that come from providing sufficient mental health care in correctional facilities. Treatment of mental health concerns in the criminal justice system has been demonstrated in studies to minimize recidivism and assist persons in effectively reintegrating into society. Adequate mental health treatment can eventually lower the expenses of jail as well as the social and economic consequences of crime by breaking the cycle of crime and recidivism (Li). Furthermore, by providing adequate care for those suffering from mental illnesses, communities and families can benefit since these people are better suited to contribute to society and maintain stable relationships. It is critical to recognize the difficulties associated with implementing good mental health care in the criminal justice system, such as limited resources and the necessity to prioritize spending. However, these difficulties should not overshadow the fundamental need to address jailed people’s mental health needs, as well as the long-term advantages that arise.
The Impact of Mental Health Treatment (or Lack of it) on Incarcerated Individuals
People who are imprisoned may suffer significantly from inadequate or no mental health care. Without proper access to therapy, those who have mental health concerns and who are jailed may see a worsening of their conditions, which might result in further behavioral and emotional issues (Stringer). Increased instances of aggression against others, self-harm, and interrupted recovery are all possible outcomes of this. On the other hand, giving inmates access to proper mental health care can enhance their well-being, cause them to behave better, and increase their prospects of making a successful transition back into society. The lack of funding and access to mental health experts inside the criminal justice system is one of the biggest obstacles to delivering mental health therapy to those who are jailed (Forrester and Hopkin). This frequently leads to ineffective or delayed therapy, which can have detrimental effects on the person’s mental and emotional health. Additionally, the stigma associated with mental illness can hinder people from seeking or receiving therapy, which can further isolate them and worsen their condition.
It is crucial to acknowledge the crucial role that mental health care plays in the recovery and effective reintegration of people who are jailed back into society. Adequate access to mental health treatments can result in better conduct, decreased recidivism, and better overall results for the person receiving them as well as for society at large. Given the significance of this problem, it is essential to give priority to developing programs and allocating resources for increasing inmates’ access to mental health care. This might include better access to care for those who are jailed, more financing for mental health services, and the hiring and training of mental health experts. Additionally, lowering the stigma associated with mental illness and encouraging an atmosphere that is supportive of those who require treatment may be extremely important in enhancing access to care and general results.
The Moral and Ethical Ramifications of Refusing Jailed People Mental Health Treatment
Denying jailed people mental health care creates significant ethical and moral questions. The denial of treatment to those with mental illnesses raises important concerns regarding the worth and dignity of human life as well as the obligations of society to provide for the underprivileged. It might be argued that denying people access to mental health care is discrimination and a violation of their fundamental human rights. It prompts moral and ethical issues regarding society’s responsibility to help individuals in need. Regardless of the conditions, utilitarianism and deontology both contend that society has a moral duty to offer those who are suffering from mental illness the appropriate care and assistance. It is possible to see refusing treatment as a breach of these moral duties. Furthermore, denying jailed persons mental health care can have harmful effects not only on the prisoners themselves but also on society as a whole (Wallace and Wang 12). Individuals with untreated mental illness are more likely to re-offend, which can lead to a cycle of crime and jail, according to research (Shishane et al.). This not only repeats the individual’s suffering but also places a strain on the criminal justice system and society as a whole. Ultimately, the denial of mental health treatment to jailed persons presents significant ethical and moral concerns, including questions about the worth and dignity of human life, society’s responsibility to care for those in need, and society’s duty to maintain basic human rights. To guarantee that jailed persons with mental illnesses receive the treatment and assistance they need to recover and live happy lives, society must take a compassionate and evidence-based approach to address their needs.
Conclusion
Mental health is an important element of general health and well-being, and this is also true for people involved in the criminal justice system. Despite this, many correctional facilities fail to offer proper mental health therapy to jailed people, resulting in a slew of bad outcomes. This research looked at the history of mental health treatment in prisons, the present status of care, and the consequences of this neglect. To support the need for mental health treatment in correctional facilities, three key arguments have been presented:
- the critical need for mental health treatment,
- the violation of human rights that results from neglecting mental health treatment, and
- the importance of mental health treatment in reducing crime and recidivism.
As further justifications, the consequences of insufficient mental health treatment for families and communities, as well as the cost-effectiveness of providing appropriate care, were considered.
The arguments support the notion that the use of technology in education has considerably improved students’ learning experiences. It has enabled more participatory and interesting education while also increasing access to information and resources. Technology integration has also made it easier for teachers to assess pupils and give tailored feedback. The opposing argument that technology is a barrier to education is erroneous because it ignores the benefits and possibilities of technology in aiding the learning process. The right application of technology in education can result in a more dynamic and effective learning environment. The cost of delivering mental health therapy in correctional facilities, as well as the limited resources available in prisons, have been recognized and addressed.
Works Cited
Beaudry, Gabrielle, et al. “Effectiveness of psychological interventions in prison to reduce recidivism: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.” The Lancet Psychiatry, vol. 8, no. 9, Sept. 2021, pp. 759–773, Web.
Behrend, Dawn. National Alliance on Mental Illness. 2022.
Bonfine, Natalie, et al. “Meeting the needs of justice-involved people with serious mental illness within community behavioral health systems.” Psychiatric Services, 2019, p. appi.ps.2019004, Web.
Dillenburger, and E Kristin. “DEcarceration: Breaking the cycle of recidivism with societal prison architecture – ProQuest.” Www.proquest.com, 2020, Web.
Forrester, Andrew, and Gareth Hopkin. “Mental health in the criminal justice system: a pathways approach to service and research design.” Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 2019, Web.
Galletta, Esther, et al. “Societal reentry of prison inmates with mental illness: obstacles, programs, and best practices.” Journal of Correctional Health Care, vol. 27, no. 1, 2021, pp. 58–65, Web.
Lewis, Richard H. “The Effects of victimization, post-traumatic stress disorder, and heart rate reactivity on antisocial behavior – ProQuest.” Www.proquest.com, 2019, Web.
Li, Melissa. “From prisons to communities: Confronting re-entry challenges and social inequality.” Web.
May, James R., and Erin Daly. “Dignity rights for a pandemic.” Law, Culture and the Humanities, 2020, p. 174387212094451, Web.
Morin, amy. “How being in prison might affect your mental health.” Verywell Mind, 2021, Web.
Odgers, Candice L., and Michaeline R. Jensen. “Annual research review: Adolescent mental health in the digital Age: Facts, fears, and future directions.” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, vol. 61, no. 3, 2020, Web.
Presley, Brandon, and Kimberly Morton Cuthrell. “Mental and physical well-being in prisoners.” International Neuropsychiatric Disease Journal, vol. 18, no. 4, 2022, pp. 29–40, Web.
Scott, Russ, et al. “A prison mental health network in the RANZCP.” Australasian Psychiatry, 2023, p. 103985622211464, Web.
Shishane, Kwanele, et al. “Mental health disorders and recidivism among incarcerated adult offenders in a correctional facility in South Africa: A cluster analysis.” PLOS ONE, vol. 18, no. 1, 2023, p. e0278194, Web.
Stringer, Heather. “Improving mental health for inmates.” American Psychological Association, Web.
Wallace, Danielle, and Xia Wang. “Does in-prison physical and mental health impact recidivism?” SSM – Population Health, vol. 11, 2020, pp. 1–16, Web.