The case was between Oliver Brown, Mrs. Sadie Emanuel, and Mrs. Richard Lawton. They were appellants against the board of education of Topeka, Shawnee County in Kansas, the appellee. The case’s location was Monroe School, where it was argued on 6th December 1952, reargued on 7th December 1953, and decided on 17th May 1954. The case was a consolidation of the cases in Kansas, Washington D.C., and South Carolina relating to the segregation of public schools based on races among the students (Brown v. Board of Education, 1955). African American students had been denied admissions to some schools based on laws that only allowed public schools segregation by race. From the case, the complainants proposed and argued that the seclusions targeted defilements of the Equal Protection Clause as per the U.S. Fourteenth Amendment.
The Courts Decision
The course finalized the case on 17th May 1954 by posting a unanimous opinion. Contextually, the Justices ked by Warren ruled that racial segregation of students in public schools was unconstitutional. The Court decided a right for distinct but equivalent educational amenities for the two races. Chief Justice E. Warren gave an opinion by stating that the U.S. Supreme Court held that “separate but equal” facilities were inherent violations as per the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Fourteenth Amendment.
Description of the Majority and Dissenting Opinions
The Court of Supreme ruling resulted in various opinions among legalists in which they stated multiple views from the case. The magistrates and CJ’s who reviewed the case were Warren, Black, Douglas, Minton, Jackson, and Frankfurter, who had different reasoning as per the ruling. Warren-based his opinion on social sciences information rather than the precedent of the Court. He felt that all the Americans needed to understand the logic addressed in the Court’s decision because racism was a common challenge in America (Brown v. Board of Education, 1955). The case’s majority opinion towards the case ruling was that separate but equivalent educational facilities among the racial minorities violated the equal protection clause of the students. There was a need for equal education among all students across the United States regardless of their race.
According to my perspective, I concur with the decision that Chief Justice Warren Earl made. Racism was dangerous, which could destroy the relationship between individuals and rekindle the discriminations among individuals. Warren was right because any unfavorable decision from the Supreme Court could result in a conflict between the appellee and the appellants. The idea of separate but equal educational facilities for the racial minorities was seen as unequal because it was seen as a boundary between the two races (Brown v. Board of Education, 1954). Finally, I concur with the Courts ruling because the language used was accessible to non-lawyers, and everyone could understand the implication and meaning of the decision. Conclusively, Topeka’s Board of Education of Topeka had no right to repudiate students’ chances to join their school due to racial differences.
Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483, 74 S. Ct. 686, 98 L. Ed. 873 (1954). U.S. Supreme Court. Pp. 483. Web.