The Impact of Racial and Gender Diversity on Jury Deliberations in Twelve Angry Men
Introduction
The composition of a jury, particularly regarding race and gender, is a critical aspect of the legal system. In the 1957 film adaptation of “Twelve Angry Men” and its original play, the jury is all-white and all-male, raising questions about the potential for bias in the deliberation process. However, in the 1997 remake of the film, the introduction of four African American jurors sparks a conversation about the role of diversity in jury selection. The inclusion of diverse jurors based on race and gender is essential in promoting fairness and equity in the judicial system, as it can significantly impact the outcome of trials, as demonstrated in “Twelve Angry Men.”
The Influence of Race
The 1997 remake of “Twelve Angry Men,” including four African American jurors, highlights the impact of racial diversity. One principal argument favoring diverse juries is that they can provide a broader perspective and reduce the potential for racial bias (Rennison and Dodge 78). As proven in the film, African American jurors bring unique viewpoints, such as a deeper understanding of racial discrimination and the justice system’s complexities (Dodson 267). This enriches the deliberation process, resulting in a more just and fairer verdict (Perry 46).
The Significance of Gender
While gender diversity is not addressed in any version of “Twelve Angry Men,” it is worth considering whether female jurors would have made a difference. The second main argument is that gender diversity can bring distinct perspectives and insights to the jury room (Vermette 31). Women may approach cases differently, considering factors their male counterparts might overlook (Rackley and Gee 51). Their presence could lead to more comprehensive deliberations, enhancing the overall fairness of the trial.
Conclusion
In conclusion, a jury’s composition should consider race and gender, as these factors can significantly impact the outcome of a trial. Including African American jurors in the 1997 “Twelve Angry Men” remake demonstrates how racial diversity can enhance the deliberation process and promote justice. While the play and earlier film adaptations did not address gender diversity, it is clear that incorporating female jurors could also contribute to fairer and more comprehensive deliberations. In pursuing a just legal system, it is imperative to consider and implement diverse jury selection processes, ensuring that all voices are heard and represented, ultimately leading to more equitable verdicts.
Works Cited
Dodson, Scott. “Beyond Bias in Diversity Jurisdiction.” Duke LJ, vol. 69, 2019, p. 267.
Perry, B. Diversity, Crime, and Justice in Canada. Oxford University Press, 2021.
Rackley, Erika and Graham Gee. Debating Judicial Appointments in an Age of Diversity. Routledge, 2019.
Rennison, Callie Marie, and Mary Dodge. Introduction to Criminal Justice: Systems, Diversity, and Change. SAGE Publications, 2021.
Vermette, Annette. Overrepresented: Indigenous Women as Profit Makers for the Canadian Judicial System. FriesenPress, 2023.