The first source to be used is Birck, M. A. (2018). Do you see what I see: Problems with juror bias in viewing body-camera video evidence. Michigan Journal of Race and Law, 24, 153-176. Web.
In this article, the author examines the prejudice that jurors may face when considering a case with police video recordings. It is noted that it is very important that people avoid any kind of prejudice because ordinary legal actions may seem illegal to them. It is noted that if people behave prejudicedly towards the police, it can harm them and leave a negative mark on their career. At the same time, cases are given as an example when this happened but the policemen were innocent and later could not restore their reputation.
Second source Coleman, R. J. (2020). Police body cameras: Go big or go home? Buffalo Law Review, 68(5). Web.
In this paper, the author examines the positive and negative aspects of the introduction of camera systems for police officers. On the one hand, such cameras will really help to understand how legitimate the actions of law enforcement agencies are. However, it can also be detrimental to the work of the police because they are afraid to act more aggressively where necessary, which can lead to their injury or death. In addition, the author considers many side factors that can affect the work of the police if they wear cameras that film their actions.
Another important material is Schwartz, S. A. (2020). Police brutality and racism in America. Explore, 16(5), 280-282. Web.
In this paper, the author examines the problem of police violence in general with examples of statistics. The work focuses on global trends and changes that can be adopted to improve the situation. It is said that many people have experienced brutality and racism from the police. Cameras for recording their work are considered by the author as one of the ways to combat acts of aggression.
To collect information, various sources were used that describe the introduction of cameras for police officers from different perspectives. An important aspect is the study of all the details in this case since this is a serious reform that requires confirmation. Since the case was provoked by public outcry after several incidents of police abuse, many articles on the relevant topic can be used to analyze the information and draw appropriate conclusions. Each of the sources reviewed provides a unique perspective on the issue, considering different aspects of this change. Data logging is an integral part of writing a research paper and therefore requires studying several materials.
References
Birck, M. A. (2018). Do you see what I see: Problems with juror bias in viewing body-camera video evidence. Michigan Journal of Race and Law, 24, 153-176. Web.
Coleman, R. J. (2020). Police body cameras: Go big or go home? Buffalo Law Review, 68(5). Web.
Schwartz, S. A. (2020). Police brutality and racism in America. Explore, 16(5), 280-282. Web.