Discussion: Effects of Strict Liability

Strict liability is a tort and criminal law that does not depend on actual negligence or intent to harm for it to be applied. Legal responsibilities under strict liability are absolute since the plaintiff does not need to prove malicious intent or negligence. In strict liability, the plaintiff must only prove that the defendant’s conduct influenced harm or losses. The major aim of strict liability is to deter unsafe action while encouraging individuals and companies to take responsibility for their actions. Although strict liability enhances the overall quality and safety of companies and their products, excessive pressure can hinder company operations while influencing an increase in the cost of products.

Strict liability has a significant impact on organizations and their products. First, strict liability enhances a company’s diligence by complying with stated guidelines by ensuring their operations and products are harm-free by complying with stated guidelines ((Bueno & Bright, 2020). Companies must undertake effective product research and development since they are responsible for their products. Additionally, companies observe safety measures in their operations since they are responsible for their actions (Bueno & Bright, 2020). However, excessively strict liability laws could limit flexibility in a company’s operation and drive product inflation. Overall, strict liability is beneficial to companies and their products, but only when applied to a certain limit.

Ultimately, strict liability is a legal principle that holds individuals or entities responsible for damages or injuries following their actions, regardless of whether they were negligent or intended to cause harm. Strict liability has the benefit of pressuring companies to improve diligence, safety, and quality control on products. Notably, numerous laws of strict liability could decapitate a company’s operations and influence price hike for products.

Reference

Bueno, N., & Bright, C. (2020). Implementing human rights due diligence through corporate civil liability. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 69(4), 789-818. Web.